This month marks the ninetieth anniversary
of Remembrance Day. At 11am on November 11, 1918, the war to end
all wars was officially ended. But for General Sir Arthur Currie, the highly
respected commander of the Canadian Expeditionary Force, the war wasn't
over against the political forces he had been fighting since his appointment
in 1917. Suzanne Harper reports ...
Arthur Currie, a farm boy
from Strathroy Ontario, entered the First World War without any professional
military experience under his belt.
Yet by using his brilliant
tactical skills, Currie went on to lead the Canadian Corps to victory at
Vimy Ridge, one of the bloodiest battles in recorded history. He was also
credited with accelerating the end of the Great War.
ěHis slogan was pay the
price of victory in shells -- not lives,î says Canadian historian Jack
Hyatt. ěAnd if he did anything heroic it was that.î
Although a towering figure
at six-foot-two, Currie was not what many people would consider a hero.
Described as aloof by his troops, he even earned the nickname ěGuts and
Gaiters.î Yet despite his lack of verbal skills, he found ways to inspire
the best from his men.
Currie prepared thoroughly
for every battle, including the unexpected victory by Canadian battalions
at the Battle of Vimy Ridge in April 1917.
McGill University historian
Desmond Morton said Canadians achieved the ěimpossibleî during that attack,
in which all four divisions of the Canadian Corps advanced on the Ridge
as they came under heavy fire from three German defensive lines.
ěImagine crossing a canal
under every kind of fire the Germans could bring to bear on you,î said
Morton. ěHow do you do that and not lose tens of thousands of men? Well,
Currie did it.î
One of Currie's war strategies
was a French-invented technique called the ěcreeping barrageî in which
troops advanced behind a rain of artillery which would fall just ahead
of the front line. From the French hilltop, the Canadian Corps swept into
dug-in German positions, and the main position was in Canadian hands by
the end of April 9.
Currie and the Canadian
Corps were also successful at the Battle of Passchendaele (the Third Battle
of Ypres) in November 1917, although it cost 16,000 lives.
But to Currie these battles
were easier than the protracted political battle that began with his promotion
to commander of the Canadian Corps in June 15, 1917. He became the first
Canadian to lead the Canadian Corps, who had been led strictly by British
commanders. The move earned him the permanent enmity of Major Sir Sam Hughes,
Canadian Minister of Militia and Defense, who before the war had recognised
Currie's unique talents after he took command of the Victoria (BC) Highland
50th regiment in early 1914 while still a part-time militia officer.
Although Currie's appointment
was made on the insistence of Field Marshall Sir Douglas Haig, the move
deeply offended Hughes, whose personal choice had been Sir Richard Turner,
a more senior Canadian officer.
ěCurrie's appointment was
sure to pose political problems, but Sir Arthur was clearly the superior
military commander,î observes Mark Osborne Humphries in a new book of Currie's
selected diaries, letters and reports.
The result was that Hughes
spent the rest of his life trying to destroy Currie, particularly in the
House of Commons where the general was smeared as a ěbutcherî by the Opposition
Liberals, led by Wilfrid Laurier, much to the distress of Currie who couldn't
comprehend why Canadian politicians would lie about his military record,
methods and motives.
The truth was that an unwitting
Currie had landed at the centre of the 1917 election campaign.
ěComing from a Conservative,
Hughes' personal attacks took on the air of bipartisanship as Liberals
jumped on the bandwagon, accusing Currie of being responsible for the high
casualties at Hill 70 and Passchendaele,î Humphries writes. ěCurrie never
really understood that he was caught in a political shooting match between
the (Borden-led) government and the Laurier Liberals. He saw the attacks
as personal assaults traceable directly to Sam Hughes and his cabal who
he believed were further stirring up the Laurier Liberals.î
In the spring of 1918, Currie's
leadership was put to the ultimate test with the temporary breakup of the
Canadian Corps.
ěCurrie believed the Canadian
Corps was the pre-eminent fighting force on the Western Front and he was
not afraid to tell anyone who would listen,î Humphries writes.
In the end, Currie got his
way and the Corps was reunited.
ěBeginning with the Battle
of Amiens on 8 August and concluding with the capture of Mons on the morning
of 11 November 1918, the Canadian Corps spearheaded the Allied advance
during the war's final hundred days, earning Currie widespread praise.î
Hughes' attacks grew more
vitriolic, fuelling rumours that Currie had wilfully sent Canadian soldiers
to their deaths to cover himself in glory.
ěCurrie never understood
why the Borden government did not support him against Hughes accusations
or why he was allowed to return home in obscurity without an official vote
of thanks from the House of Commons.î
Plus ca change ...
Why was Currie persecuted?
According to Humphries and other historians, Hughes and his cohorts had
plenty to threaten Currie with.
His pre-war story, it seems,
was far from glorious. Before the Battle of Vimy Ridge, Currie was almost
court-martialed for misappropriating $10,000 from a regiment in which he
served, in order to pay off a personal debt dating back to pre-war days
when an economic downturn threatened Currie and his beloved family with
financial ruin.
The affair came to the attention
of Canada's prime minister Robert Borden. But Borden refused to court martial
the nation's best soldier.
Those blemishes may have
been but a blip in the radar for many but they were grist for Hughes whose
campaign against Currie initially succeeded: so much so that Currie's knighting
on the battlefield by King George V and his lauding as ěbrilliantî by Britain's
wartime leader David Lloyd George appeared to count for nothing as Currie
returned to the private sector in 1920 in virtual obscurity.
ěPerhaps the Borden Government
was wary about further aligning itself with Currie,î Humphries speculates.
ěAfter all, who knew what other skeletons were in his closet? What is more
likely is that it was not politically expedient for the Government to be
drawn into a conflict about the conduct of the war effort. The 1917 election
had been the most divisive election in Canadian history and it was best
to allow sleeping dogs to lie. If the Government challenged Hughes' allegations
it would be a matter of debate. Borden was content to allow Currie to bear
the brunt of Hughes' wrath and, if one has a generous reading of the prime
minister's lack of action, it would be to let Currie's report (on the conduct
of the Canadian troops in 1918) speak for itself.î
Thus it was that Currie
returned to Canada uncelebrated. In 1920, Currie became principal of McGill
University, for which he is still warmly remembered.
But the propaganda war which
began with Hughes, who in 1919 made his accusations under the protection
of parliamentary immunity from libel suits, continued. Hughes died in 1921
but the matter finally came to a head in a legal battle in 1928.
Dubbed by the press as the
Third Battle of Mons, the Currie Libel Trial unfolded in a media circus
in Cobourg Ontario. Here a parade of important officers and compelling
witnesses, including the father of George Price, the only Canadian listed
as killed in action on 11 November 1918, staunchly supported Currie. In
the end, Currie won a tiny cash settlement and secured his reputation,
finally putting Hughes' ghost to rest.
Currie died in Montreal
in November 1933, months after Hitler's ascent to power in Germany which
sowed the seeds of another world war six years later.
Did Currie see what lay
ahead?
As his diaries show, war
was never far from his mind. By the end of his long, complicated and accomplished
life, the optimism that fed Currie's prewar business speculations and wartime
naivete had turned to pessimism. Yet personal failure had also become personal
triumph.
* The Selected Papers of Sir Arthur Currie, edited by Mark Osborne Humphries, LCMSDS Press of Wilfrid Laurier University, £20.99 available through Gazelle Books, on www.gazellebooks.com